Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

449
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
449
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

454
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
454
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

290
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
290
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

887
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
887
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glycemic trajectory after face-to-face diabetes self-management education: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Diabetes research and clinical practice·2026
Same author

Hematological abnormalities in clinically diagnosed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: prevalence, clinical correlates, and fibrosis risk in a case-control study from Qatar.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cancers·2026
Same author

The association between prenatal psychological distress, sociodemographic disparities, and adverse birth outcomes in the United States: Findings from the ECHO birth cohort.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Epidemiology and infection·2026
Same author

Correction: Infoveillance of COVID-19 Infections in Dentistry Using Platform X: Descriptive Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Dual Targeted Therapy for Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Value of the TyG Index and CHG Index in Gastric Cancer.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

A Large Language Model Pipeline for Stroke Staging Using Electronical Medical Records.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Analysis of Item-Level Disagreement Between Researchers and ChatGPT on the PEDro Scale for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Experimental Studies.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same journal

Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination Strategies for COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Six Entrenched Misconceptions About Meta-Analysis Models.

Ibrahim Elmakaty1, Jazeel Abdulmajeed2, Tawanda Chivese3

  • 1Department of Medical Education, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
|February 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies six common misconceptions in meta-analysis model selection and interpretation. It proposes a framework for choosing statistical models based on scientific objectives and assumptions, improving evidence synthesis.

Keywords:
estimatorsheterogeneitymeta‐analysismodel choiceparameter assumptions

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

78.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Scientific methodology

Background:

  • Meta-analysis is crucial for evidence-based medicine.
  • Persistent misconceptions hinder proper model selection and interpretation in meta-analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and clarify six entrenched misconceptions in meta-analysis.
  • To propose a purpose-driven, assumption-aware framework for model selection in evidence synthesis.

Main Methods:

  • The study challenges common beliefs regarding parameter assumptions, model choice, and heterogeneity.
  • It refutes the idea that fixed-effect models are limited or that only random-effects models address heterogeneity.
  • It analyzes the impact of heterogeneity on model choice and the effectiveness of different estimators.

Main Results:

  • Inference depends on the scientific objective, not solely on model assumptions.
  • Fixed-effect models can accommodate heterogeneity, and random-effects models are not the sole solution.
  • Model selection should be guided by assumptions and inferential goals, not just observed heterogeneity.
  • Recent common parameters assumption models effectively handle diversity and heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

  • Clarifying these misconceptions leads to better model selection in meta-analysis.
  • A purpose-driven, assumption-aware framework enhances conceptual clarity, analytical validity, and reproducibility.
  • This approach improves the rigor and reliability of evidence synthesis.