Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
Published on: September 26, 2017
Quantifying drinking water treatment plant robustness with respect to turbidity: Examining raw water and treatment
Noshin Nawar Reza1, Sigrid Peldszus1, Peter M Huck1
1University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
With the emerging risks of climate change, it can be challenging for drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) to maintain regulated water quality parameters to protect public health. Severe and more frequent precipitation events can increase suspended particles in surface water, which have been associated with water-borne pathogens, elevating public health risks. To manage such spikes, DWTPs should be robust. In the present study, the concept of operational robustness was advanced by tailoring general robustness framework to a turbidity-specific framework for two full-scale DWTPs: Plant A (river-based) and Plant B (lake-based) for normal raw water turbidity, and historical and future extreme turbidity events (Plant A only). The turbidity robustness index (TRI) was used to quantify the robustness of the critical treatment steps. Weekly TRIs revealed process-specific insights - robust filtration in both plants and comparatively higher robustness of coagulation and sand-ballasted clarification (CSBC) in Plant A compared to conventional coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) in Plant B. A novel development of this study was to develop a procedure to distinguish turbidity events from normal turbidity to investigate the performance of individual treatment steps in periods of upsets. For the studied plants, higher TRIs were not correlated with historical turbidity events, indicating the need for further assessment of the DWTPs response to future extreme events. The overall robustness indices indicated that Plant A was more robust than Plant B. For Plant A, the response to an extreme turbidity event was assessed in a factorial experiment using modified jar tests, resulting in suggestions for improving the CSBC process. The robustness framework can be used as a simple and practical diagnostic tool in DWTPs to evaluate the operational regimes retroactively, identifying under-performing unit(s), enhance their robustness by implementing short-term operational changes and possibly establish raw water turbidity boundaries beyond which the operational adjustments may not work, and which can signal the need to initiate long-term capital planning to prepare for potential adverse effects of climate change.
More Related Videos
10:48EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples
Published on: March 28, 2015
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Testing Water Quality
Quality of Water
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods