Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Long-term efficacy and disease-specific responsiveness to protirelin in patients with spinocerebellar degeneration: A
Shohei Okusa1, Toshiki Tezuka1, Jin Nakahara1
1Department of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Parkinson's Disease Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Introduction:
The thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analog protirelin has short-term benefits for cerebellar ataxia (CA), but its long-term efficacy and the subtype-specific responsiveness of spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) patients remain unclear.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 92 SCD patients (273 courses) treated with protirelin between July 2011 and October 2025, including patients with idiopathic CA (IDCA), multiple system atrophy with predominant CA (MSA-C) or parkinsonism (MSA-P), and genetic subtypes including spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) type 6, SCA31 and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA). Responders were defined as showing ≥1-point improvement on the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).
Results:
Protirelin was effective in 64.1% of subjects, with significant improvement overall (p < 0.001) and significant SARA gains in MSA-C (p = 0.047), IDCA (p = 0.02), and SCA31 (p = 0.01). Change in SARA score (ΔSARA) correlated negatively with age and positively with total protirelin dose in IDCA, and negatively with age and disease duration and positively with baseline SARA score in SCA31. Several IDCA and DRPLA patients maintained clinical benefit for more than 10 years. All MSA-P discontinued protirelin within 2 years and all MSA-C within 5 years; some SCA6, and SCA31 patients continued for ≥5 years. Adverse effects were infrequent (2/92, 2.2%).
Conclusion:
Protirelin is efficacious in SCD patients and well-tolerated, particularly in slow-progressing phenotypes (IDCA and SCA31); its benefit in rapidly progressing ataxias (MSA-C) may be confined to early disease stages. Prospective studies with standardized dosing and long-term follow-up are warranted to establish evidence-based protocols for TRH-related therapy for CA.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024