Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Lateral Molar Approach-Driven Transoral Endoscopic Procedure for Benign Infratemporal Fossa Tumor Resection
Published on: August 15, 2025
Age and Risk of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury After Removal of Lower Third Molars Close to the Mandibular Nerve
Judith Soler-Capdevila1, Octavi Camps-Font2, Gemma Sanmartí-García3
1Assistant Professor of Integrated Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Implantology, Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
Extraction of lower third molars (3 Ms) carries a risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. Anatomical proximity is a well-known risk factor, although the effect of patient age remains insufficiently explored.
Purpose:
The study purpose was to measure the association between age and IAN injury among patients whose 3 Ms are close to the mandibular canal.
Study Design, Setting, Sample:
This case-control study included patients at increased risk for IAN injury due to close proximity of the lower 3 Ms to the mandibular canal, as assessed by preoperative cone-beam computed tomography. The exclusion criteria were poor preoperative CBCT, cysts or tumours related to the 3 Ms, intake of drugs related to osteonecrosis of the jaws, and previous radiotherapy.
Exposure Variable:
The exposure variable was age.
Main Outcome Variable:
The outcome variable was IAN neurosensory status. Cases were defined as IAN neurosensory deficit at 1 month after extraction.
Covariates:
The following covariates were analyzed: sex, body mass index, operated side, 3 Ms position (Pell and Gregory and Winter classifications), number and shape of the roots, IAN position (lingual, buccal, or apical), ostectomy, and tooth sectioning.
Statistical Analysis:
Univariate associations were explored with simple binary logistic regression, reporting crude odds ratios (ORS). The adjusted OR for age was calculated using multivariate binary logistic regression using Stata 14.2. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.
Results:
A total of 219 patients (60% female) were screened; the mean age was 28.2 ± 10.7 years. Thirty-seven subjects (16.89%) presented an IAN neurosensory deficit 1 month postextraction (cases). These cases were compared with 111 randomly selected subjects without IAN impairment from the initial cohort of 219 patients. The risk of IAN neurosensory deficit increased with age (adjusted OR per year = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.11; P = .008). Impaction depth (OR = 9.29; 95% CI, 2.44 to 35.39; P = .001) and lingual position of the IAN (OR = 3.09; 95% CI, 1.06 to 9.03; P = .039) were also associated with increased risk. Each additional year of age increased the adjusted OR of neurosensory deficit by 6%.
Conclusions And Relevance:
IAN neurosensory deficit occurred in 16.89% of subjects. Age was a statistically significant independent risk factor of IAN injury and should be considered in preoperative planning.
More Related Videos
06:48Ethanol-Induced Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion Block Applications for Promoting Canine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Regeneration Using an Artificial Nerve
Published on: November 30, 2018
07:32Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024