Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

The Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Protocol for Inducing Anhedonia in Mice
Published on: October 24, 2018
Aperiodic Signatures of Stress Sensitivity and Depression Recurrence in Adolescents
Mikki Schantell1, Nayoung Kim1, Esha Trivedi1
1Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York; Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Background:
Adolescence is a sensitive period for the emergence and refinement of cortical rhythms, which are shaped by excitatory-inhibitory (E/I) neurotransmission. However, stress-related disruptions in E/I balance may contribute to major depressive disorder (MDD). The aperiodic components of neurophysiological signals-slope and offset-index E/I dynamics and broadband power, respectively. Although altered E/I balance has been implicated in MDD and neurodevelopment more broadly, the role of aperiodic activity in predicting recurrence among adolescents remains unclear.
Methods:
Resting-state electroencephalography and structured stress interviews were acquired from adolescents (N = 148; ages 13-18 years) with current (n = 42) or remitted (n = 106) MDD. Aperiodic slope and offset were parameterized across anterior, central, and posterior electrode clusters. In remitted youths, Cox proportional hazards models tested slope-by-stress and offset-by-stress interactions predicting MDD recurrence over the subsequent 12 months.
Results:
Adolescents with current MDD exhibited significantly flatter aperiodic slopes across anterior, central, and posterior clusters (range F1,143 = 4.56-5.82, ps < .05) and lower offsets in anterior and central clusters (range F1,143 = 5.38-7.25, ps < .023) compared with remitted adolescents. Among remitted youths, significant slope-by-stress interactions predicted recurrence, wherein flatter slopes were protective against recurrence under low stress but conferred elevated risk under high stress. This effect was strongest in the anterior cluster (hazard ratio = 2.13, p < .001). The aperiodic offset did not predict recurrence.
Conclusions:
The aperiodic slope may function as a neurophysiological diathesis that amplifies stress-related risk for depression recurrence. Findings support a diathesis-stress model of adolescent MDD and highlight the aperiodic slope as a biomarker that may guide developmentally sensitive personalized prevention strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Stress and Mental Health
Individuals with depression often experience challenges in both their personal and professional...
Psychological Responses to Stress
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over...

