Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
The effects of working memory and interference control on reinforcement learning: Evidence from computational
Mengxin Wen1, Chengyan Yang2, Tongran Liu2
1State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Working memory and interference control jointly impact reinforcement learning (RL) and are linked to brain structure. High working memory load and interference impair learning, with effects related to gray matter volume and cortical thickness.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
- Computational Psychiatry
Background:
- Reinforcement learning (RL) is vital for adapting to dynamic environments.
- While working memory (WM) effects on RL are studied, the combined roles of WM and interference control (IC) and their neural underpinnings are less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the joint contributions of WM and IC to RL.
- To explore the relationship between WM, IC, RL performance, and brain morphology.
Main Methods:
- 169 healthy adults performed a probabilistic RL task with varied WM load and interference.
- RL model parameters (learning rate, inverse temperature, forgetting) and learning accuracy were measured.
- Structural MRI data (GMV, cortical thickness, sulcal depth) were acquired from 144 participants.
Main Results:
- Increased WM load impaired learning accuracy, reduced learning rates, and slowed forgetting, associated with frontoparietal/limbic network morphology.
- Interference exposure decreased learning rates and accelerated forgetting, with IC effects linked to cingulate gyrus sulcal depth.
- A significant interaction showed interference particularly impaired learning under high WM load, linked to thalamic and temporal pole structures.
Conclusions:
- WM and IC interact to shape learning processes, influencing adaptive decision-making.
- Individual differences in learning are significantly associated with specific cortical and subcortical brain structural features.
- Findings highlight the neural basis of cognitive control in complex learning environments.
More Related Videos
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
14:24An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...