Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Semi-high-throughput Imaging Method and Data Visualization Toolkit to Analyze C. elegans Embryonic Development
Published on: October 29, 2019
Practical prediction model for day 4 embryonic development potential: integration of morphology and AI scoring
Yasong Geng1, Fangfang Dai1, Haoyang Dai1
1Xingtai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Xingtai Meihe Reproductive and Genetic Hospital, Xingtai, 054000, China.
Objective:
This study aims to develop a practical predictive model for day 4 embryonic developmental potential, focusing on analyzing key influencing factors and visually presenting their relative importance, and evaluating the model's clinical applicability.
Methods:
Patients undergoing fresh day 4 embryo transfer were included. Embryos cultured to day 5 or 6 were randomly allocated into training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. Predictive factors for transferable blastocyst formation were identified using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. The discriminative ability of three models-Model 1 (day 3 morphology), Model 2 (day 3 morphology + iDAScore), and Model 3 (day 3 morphology + D4 morphology + iDAScore)-was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A nomogram was developed using independent predictors, and its performance was assessed through calibration analyses. In addition, the predictive accuracy for high-quality blastocyst formation, implantation, and live birth rates was evaluated.
Results:
The data from 9779 embryos across 2409 patients were analyzed. Among 5977 embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage, 4201 were assigned to the training cohort and 1776 to the validation cohort. Degree of compaction, iDAScore, and cell numbers on day 3 were identified as independent predictors of transferable blastyst formation. Model 3 outperformed the other models, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.841 (95% CI 0.824-0.858) in the training cohort and 0.828 (95% CI 0.801-0.855) in the validation cohort. The nomogram based on Model 3 demonstrated strong calibration, with predicted and observed rates closely aligned (relative mean error: 0.019 in the training cohort, 0.360 in the validation cohort). The model also accurately predicted high-quality blastocyst formation (AUC: 0.808, 95% CI 0.789-0.826), implantation rates (AUC: 0.635, 95% CI 0.598-0.672), and live birth rates (AUC: 0.643, 95% CI 0.593-0.692).
Conclusions:
Degree of compaction on day 4, iDAScore, and cell numbers on day 3 are independent predictors of transferable blastocyst formation. The proposed nomogram provides an effective tool for predicting embryonic development potential, with strong performance across multiple outcomes.
More Related Videos
12:59Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation
Published on: February 28, 2021
05:13Author Spotlight: Advancing Therapeutic Strategies for Improving Pregnancy Rates by Analyzing Embryo-Endometrium Interactions
Published on: June 21, 2024