Phase 1 Study of INBRX-105, a TNFRSF9 (4-1BB) and PD-L1 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Select Solid Tumors

Jong Chul Park1, David Berz2, Manish R Sharma3

  • 1Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

INBRX-105, a novel immunotherapy, showed limited efficacy and concerning liver toxicity in solid tumors. Further clinical development was halted due to these safety and response rate issues.

Area of Science:

  • Immunotherapy
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are crucial in cancer therapy, but tumor resistance necessitates novel treatment strategies.
  • INBRX-105 is a tetravalent agonist targeting PD-L1 and TNFRSF9 (4-1BB), designed to enhance anti-tumor immunity.
  • This study addresses the unmet need for effective treatments in patients with advanced solid tumors, particularly those resistant to CPIs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of INBRX-105 as a monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.
  • To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of INBRX-105 in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A Phase 1, open-label, four-part study (NCT03809624) involving adults with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable solid tumors.
  • INBRX-105 was administered intravenously every 2, 3, or 4 weeks, with dose escalation and expansion cohorts for both monotherapy and combination arms.
  • Patients included those with checkpoint inhibitor-relapsed/refractory (CPI-R/R) or CPI-naïve disease, with safety and preliminary response as primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

Main Results:

  • The maximum tolerated dose of INBRX-105 was determined to be 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks.
  • The most frequent treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, and nausea.
  • Hepatotoxicity was a significant concern, with 41 patients experiencing INBRX-105-related hepatic adverse events.
  • The overall objective response rate was 8.8% (monotherapy 3.7%, combination 13.9%), with a higher response rate of 30% in CPI-naïve patients receiving the combination therapy.

Conclusions:

  • The observed low response rates and significant hepatic safety signals do not support the continued clinical development of INBRX-105.
  • There is a continued need for novel immunotherapeutic combinations with non-redundant mechanisms to overcome tumor resistance and improve patient outcomes.