Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026
Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Patient Preference for Non-Operative Treatment Strategy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Surendran Veeraiah1, Revathy Sudhakar1, Jagan Murugan2
1Department of Psycho-Oncology & RCTC, Cancer Institute (WIA), 38, Sardar Patel Road, Adyar, 600036 Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.
Introduction:
Surgical resection remains the standard treatment in the management of rectal cancer. Omitting surgery in carefully selected patients who achieve a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy is stated to provide acceptable oncological outcomes. This survey aimed to understand the preference of patients with rectal cancer towards non-operative management (NOM).
Method:
A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among patients diagnosed with locally advanced mid- or lower-third rectal cancer. A structured interview schedule was used to assess the willingness for the trial under various conditions associated with an imaginary scenario of NOM after a complete response to an intensive neoadjuvant treatment. Psychological parameters were collected using Fear of Progression (FOP)-12, Life Orientation Test-Revised, and Multidimensional Health Locus of Control-Form C (MHLC-C). The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results:
Of the 59 patients included, 37.3% expressed an overall willingness for NOM. While 91.5% expressed willingness for the NOM if there were no increased side effects of neoadjuvant treatment, 44.1% reported willingness with even 10% increased side effects, 54.2% with the suggested intensive follow-up schedule, and 10.2% if there was a 25% chance of tumour regrowth. In total, 74.6% and 16.9% consented if the cure rate with NOM was similar to and less than surgery, respectively. Overall, 50% had significant FOP, and 79.7% had low optimism. Comparatively higher MHLC-C score (M = 22.29; SD = 4.33) indicates that the majority of the patients attribute events to luck or fate.
Conclusion:
We observed that only one-third of patients in this study preferred a NOM to radical surgery; the decision was mainly driven by FOP and fear of increased side effects of neoadjuvant treatment. Detailed counselling of the patients about the treatment modality and NOM strategy is essential before considering any patient for an intentional watch-and-wait approach.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-025-02390-w.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
01:26Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...