Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
Success in Gingival Recession Coverage: Prognostic Indicators From Private Practice
Michael Saminsky1, Liat Chaushu1, Benjamin R Coyac2
1Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, tau.ac.il.
Successful root coverage in periodontal therapy depends on factors like tooth type and defect severity. Smoking negatively impacts outcomes, while canines and first premolars show better results for treating gingival recession.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Dental Surgery
- Regenerative Dentistry
Background:
- Gingival recession affects a significant portion of the population, leading to aesthetic concerns and increased risk of root surface caries and abrasion.
- Successful root coverage is crucial for restoring function and aesthetics, but predictability varies based on defect characteristics and patient factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify key patient and treatment parameters associated with successful root coverage in periodontal defects.
- Define success as achieving 70% root coverage for Miller Class I-II/RT1 defects and 50% for Miller Class III/RT2 defects.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of dental records from patients undergoing surgical treatment for gingival recessions.
- Collected data included general health, smoking status, recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), keratinized tissue (KT) width, and clinical attachment loss (CAL).
- Logistic regression and linear mixed-effects models were employed to determine correlations with treatment success up to 180 months.
Main Results:
- Smoking, Miller Class II/RT1, Miller Class III/RT2 defects, and lateral teeth were negatively associated with successful root coverage.
- Canines and first premolars demonstrated a positive association with successful coverage.
- Initial RD, RW, and Miller Class III/RT2 defects significantly influenced greater CAL gain, KT gain, and reduced residual RD (RRD).
Conclusions:
- Long-term root coverage success is influenced by smoking status, defect classification (Miller Class II-III/RT1-2), and tooth location.
- Canine and first premolar teeth are more favorable for root coverage procedures.
- Initial recession depth and width, along with defect severity, positively impact clinical attachment and keratinized tissue gain and reduce residual recession.
More Related Videos
06:06Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy and Probiotic Lactobacillus Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis and Peri-Implant Disease
Published on: May 9, 2022
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Hindsight Biases
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
First Derivative Test: Problem Solving
Protecting Self-Esteem