Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
A Comparative Observational Study on the WHO Labour Care Guide Versus the WHO Modified Partograph on Labour Outcome
Kurukuntla Vishnu Priya1, Shreedevi Kori1, Rajasri G Yaliwal1
1Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri B. M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Introduction:
Labour is a critical physiological process requiring close monitoring to ensure optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes. Traditional labour monitoring using the WHO Modified Partograph has been widely adopted; however, concerns regarding rigid time thresholds and unnecessary interventions have prompted the development of the WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG), a more individualized and woman-centred tool aligned with contemporary evidence. Comparative data between these two tools remain limited. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the WHO LCG with the WHO Modified Partograph in terms of maternal labour outcomes and caesarean section rates among primigravida women at term.
Methods:
This comparative observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. A total of 146 primigravida women in spontaneous labour with singleton, cephalic pregnancies at 37-40 weeks of gestation were enrolled. Participants were equally allocated to monitoring with either the WHO LCG (n = 73) or the WHO Modified Partograph (n = 73). Maternal labour parameters, mode of delivery, hospital stay, and neonatal outcomes were recorded.
Results:
Women monitored using the WHO LCG had significantly shorter durations of the active phase and the second stage of labour and a markedly lower caesarean section rate compared with those monitored using the Modified Partograph (p < 0.001). Vaginal delivery rates were significantly higher, and hospital stays were shorter in the LCG group. Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR (appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, respiration) scores, birth weight, NICU admissions, and NICU stay duration, were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion:
The WHO LCG is a more effective intrapartum monitoring tool than the WHO Modified Partograph, improving maternal labour outcomes without compromising neonatal safety. Its adoption may enhance labour efficiency, reduce unnecessary caesarean deliveries, and support woman-centred obstetric care.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Naturalistic Observations
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Odds Ratio