Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.1K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

11.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
11.8K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are There Differences in Return-to-Work Experiences for Workers Who Acquired COVID-19 at Work Compared to Workers who Sustained a Non-COVID-19 Work-Related Injury or Illness?

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC), Workplace Mental Health (MH) Stigma and Psychological Distress Among Canadian Employees: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same author

Weather, air pollution, and migraine: A case-time series analysis examining environmental exposures and transient health outcomes recorded via smartphone application.

Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Heat Exposure and Health Outcomes in Construction Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Environmental health insights·2026
Same author

Psychiatric hospitalizations among Canadian Armed Forces Veterans and former Royal Canadian Mounted Police members residing in Ontario: A retrospective cohort study.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2026
Same author

Exact Randomized Two-Stage Phase 2 Clinical Trial Designs for Two Binary Co-Primary Endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Subgroup Analysis of Interval-censored Failure Time Data With Application to Alzheimer's Disease.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Rejoinder to Commentaries on "A Perspective on the Appropriate Implementation of ICH E9(R1) Addendum Strategies for Handling Intercurrent Events".

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Multi-Stage Drop-the-Loser Design With Superiority Boundaries.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable ROI Identification in Brain Image Analysis: Overcoming CNN Black Box Challenges With Kriging-Enhanced Adaptive Sampling.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Correction for Participation Bias in Nonprobability Samples Using Multiple Reference Surveys.

Victoria Landsman1,2, Lingxiao Wang3, Ivan Carrillo-Garcia4

  • 1Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Canada.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework to reduce bias in health research surveys using multiple reference samples. The proposed calibration estimators improve accuracy when participation mechanisms are unknown.

Keywords:
calibrationfinite population inferencepseudo‐weightsraking ratiovariance estimation

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Survey methodology
  • Statistical inference
  • Health research

Background:

  • Nonprobability sampling is increasingly used in health research.
  • Participation mechanisms in these samples are often unknown, leading to potential bias in estimates and associations.
  • Existing methods for statistical inference from nonprobability samples are limited to a single reference sample.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general framework for addressing participation bias in nonprobability samples using multiple reference surveys.
  • To extend current statistical inference capabilities beyond single-reference sample limitations.
  • To focus on calibration estimators for practical implementation and flexibility.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a general framework accommodating multiple reference surveys.
  • Focused on calibration estimators, a flexible special case within the framework.
  • Proposed two variance estimation methods: Taylor linearization and leave-one-out jackknife.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework successfully addresses participation bias.
  • Raking ratio calibration estimators showed satisfactory performance, especially with dispersed participation probabilities.
  • Variance estimates for continuous outcomes were markedly smaller using the proposed methods.

Conclusions:

  • The new framework and calibration estimators effectively mitigate bias in nonprobability samples.
  • The methods offer practical advantages, particularly with limited microdata access.
  • Demonstrated utility in a real-world study of Canadian working adults.