Kava consumption and the rise of sociopolitical complexity in Oceania

Humans have been using psychoactive substances for millennia, despite their potential negative health and social consequences. According to some scholars, our craving for mind-altering drugs is an evolutionary mistake-a hijacking of our reward system. In contrast, the "drunk hypothesis" argues that intoxication has been adaptive and essential for the rise of large-scale societies because it promotes social bonding, increases cooperation, alleviates stress, and enhances human creativity. Here, we test this hypothesis using the example of kava, a traditional Pacific beverage with a range of psychoactive effects, made from the root of Piper methysticum. Our analysis of 83 Oceanic-speaking societies shows a positive relationship between traditional kava consumption and both political complexity and social stratification. However, the results are not robust to controls for nonindependence. Moreover, we found no evidence of coevolution between kava drinking and either of the two sociopolitical traits after controlling for spatial nonindependence. Despite the cultural significance of kava in many Pacific societies, our results suggest that its consumption was unlikely to have been a major driver of sociopolitical complexity, underscoring the importance of controlling for nonindependence in cross-cultural studies.