Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Intelligibility of interrupted and checkerboard speech with two talkers: Further evidence for four speech cue
Jun Hasegawa1,2, Kazuo Ueda3, Hiroshige Takeichi4
1Acoustic Design Course, Graduate School of Design, Kyushu University, 4-9-1 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815-8540, Japan.
Abstract:
Segregating target speech in a multi-talker background would require organizing speech fragments into a coherent stream of speech. The current investigation explored the intelligibility of temporally interrupted and checkerboard (interrupted in time and frequency) speech stimuli with one and two talkers. A series of experiments with one-talker stimuli revealed that the intelligibility of interrupted speech became lowest at around a 255-ms segment duration. In contrast, for two- and four-band checkerboard speech, the minimum intelligibility occurred at around 113-160-ms segment durations. Two-talker experiments revealed that no phonemic restoration was found, and that signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) between target and competing talkers had no clear effect on the target intelligibility of interrupted (and staggered) speech and two- and four-band checkerboard speech. Still, SNRs dominated the intelligibility of two-talker checkerboard speech with eight or more frequency bands. The probability summation model may account for the intelligibility minimum in both interrupted and checkerboard speech with a single talker. The results suggest that the four speech cue channels explain the similarity of the intelligibility curves for two- and four-band checkerboard speech.
More Related Videos
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:44Assessment of Cerebral Lateralization in Children using Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound fTCD
Published on: September 27, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Channels of Non-Verbal Communication
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Non-Verbal Cues
Sound Waves: Interference
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...