Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Secondary deformity following paediatric tibial lengthening with circular fixators
Corentin Petitpas1,2, Camille Girardin3,4, Santiago Claudel3,4
1Pediatric Orthopaedic Department, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France. petitpas.corentin@gmail.com.
Purpose:
To evaluate the incidence, magnitude, and risk factors for secondary angular deformity after tibial lengthening with a circular external fixator in skeletally immature patients. We hypothesized that younger age and low bone healing index would predispose to late valgus drift.
Methods:
A retrospective review was conducted on 98 children who underwent tibial lengthening using a circular external fixator, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Radiographic assessment included full-length standing AP radiographs and lateral tibial views obtained preoperatively, at fixator removal, six months post-removal, and at final follow-up. Measured parameters included the mechanical Medial Proximal Tibial Angle, Center of Rotation of Angulation, and Posterior Proximal Tibial Angle. Risk factors for secondary deformity were analyzed using independent T test, Chi-Square test, Pearson test and multivariate logistic regression.
Results:
A valgus deformity greater than 3° developed in 36 patients (37%), primarily within the first six months after frame removal. Younger age at surgery (p = 0.017) and a bone healing index ≤ 40 days/cm (OR 2.3; p = 0.049) were significantly associated with valgus drift. A progressive valgus shift in CORA correlated with a shorter consolidation index (p = 0.021). Sagittal alignment showed a small but significant early decrease.
Conclusion:
Secondary valgus deformity is a common and under-recognized complication following tibial lengthening with a circular external fixator in skeletally immature patients. Younger age at surgery and low bone healing index are the principal risk factors for this late angular drift. Furthermore, they question the efficacy of intentional frontal overcorrection to reliably prevent secondary deformity and suggest that additional corrective strategies may be required.
More Related Videos
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
08:20A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
Published on: March 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Deformation in a Circular Shaft
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Plastic Deformation in Circular Shafts
Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula