The protective effects of Silymarin in diabetic wound healing: A review

Hanghang Zhou1, Chengqing Ding2, Jianxiong Qiao1

  • 1The Second Hospital and Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Medicine
|February 24, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Silymarin (SM) and its active component silibinin (SB) show promise for treating diabetic wounds by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm SM/SB efficacy for diabetic wound healing.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Biochemistry
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Diabetic wounds are a severe complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), characterized by significantly impaired healing.
  • The complex pathogenesis involves vascular dysfunction, neuropathy, hyperglycemia, infection, inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune dysfunction.
  • Current treatments for diabetic wounds are limited, necessitating novel therapeutic strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the therapeutic potential of Silymarin (SM) and its active component silibinin (SB) for enhancing diabetic wound healing.
  • To explore the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of SM/SB in the context of diabetes mellitus complications.
  • To highlight the need for further research and clinical validation of SM/SB-based therapies.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed research on Silymarin (SM) and silibinin (SB) in relation to diabetes mellitus and wound healing.
  • Synthesis of evidence regarding the anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antidiabetic, hypoglycemic, neuroprotective, and vascular-protective properties of SM/SB.
  • Exploration of potential mechanisms of action for SM/SB in promoting diabetic wound closure.

Main Results:

  • Silymarin (SM) and silibinin (SB) exhibit significant anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.
  • SM/SB demonstrate antidiabetic and hypoglycemic effects, potentially improving glycemic control relevant to wound healing.
  • Neuroprotective and vascular/endothelial-protective effects of SM/SB may contribute to improved healing outcomes in diabetic patients.

Conclusions:

  • Silymarin (SM) and silibinin (SB) show promising therapeutic potential for diabetic wound healing through multiple beneficial mechanisms.
  • Further high-quality clinical studies are essential to validate the efficacy of SM/SB in diabetic wound management.
  • Advancements in biomaterials could enhance SM/SB delivery and efficacy, facilitating clinical translation for novel wound closure therapies.