Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

05:15
Grossing of Non-neoplastic Globes, Including Fetal Eyes
Published on: May 30, 2025
573
Histopathological Risk Features in Primary and Secondary Enucleation for Group D Retinoblastoma: A
Khawaja Muhammad Ammar Ali Javed1, Anum Javed2,3, Usman Vayani3
1Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Cureus
|February 24, 2026
Summary
Secondary enucleation for Group D retinoblastoma (RB) showed more high-risk features than primary enucleation. Delaying RB treatment may allow disease progression, underscoring timely intervention importance.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Oncology
- Pathology
Background:
- Group D retinoblastoma (RB) signifies advanced intraocular disease with high treatment failure risk.
- Globe-sparing therapies improve ocular salvage but histopathological data for enucleated Group D eyes, especially after failed conservative treatment, is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate high-risk histopathological features in Group D RB eyes undergoing primary versus secondary enucleation.
- To compare the histopathological risk profile based on the timing of enucleation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of enucleated Group D RB eyes (n=8).
- Eyes were categorized into primary (n=4) or secondary (n=4) enucleation groups.
- Histopathological examination for high-risk features: optic nerve invasion (post-laminar, cut-end), massive choroidal invasion, scleral invasion.
Main Results:
- High-risk features were present in 50% of eyes (4/8).
- Secondary enucleation eyes showed a higher prevalence of high-risk features (75%) compared to primary enucleation eyes (25%).
- No statistically significant association between enucleation timing and high-risk pathology (p=0.49).
Conclusions:
- High-risk histopathological features are more common in Group D RB eyes undergoing secondary enucleation after failed globe-sparing therapy.
- Delayed enucleation may permit microscopic disease progression, emphasizing the need for timely intervention in select advanced cases.
- Findings support careful risk assessment for globe-sparing approaches in Group D RB.

