Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
General Aspects of Identification, Prevention, and Protection From Medical Errors in Radiation Oncology
Marija Živković Radojević1,2, Ksenija Bosnjakovic3, Neda Milosavljević1,2
1Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, SRB.
None:
Medical errors represent an inherent risk in all areas of medicine, but in radiation oncology, they are of particular concern due to the complexity of treatment pathways and the potential severity of consequences. While legal systems often equate medical error with negligent treatment, clinicians typically view medical error as an unintended deviation occurring despite adherence to accepted standards of care. This conceptual discrepancy contributes to fear-driven practice, underreporting of adverse events, and missed opportunities for system-level learning. In this in-depth review, we synthesize current evidence on the definitions, mechanisms, and classification of medical errors, with a specific focus on radiation oncology. We critically analyze error patterns across pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment phases, emphasizing the interplay between human factors, system vulnerabilities, and technological complexity. Beyond technical considerations, this review provides a novel integrative perspective by linking guideline-based practice, incident learning systems, safety culture, communication strategies, and emerging artificial intelligence-assisted quality assurance approaches. Using Serbia as an illustrative example of a developing country, we highlight how legal frameworks centered predominantly on criminal liability, combined with high clinical workload and limited national reporting systems, may inadvertently discourage transparency and learning from errors. We propose a multidimensional safety framework that integrates protocol harmonization, non-punitive reporting, structured error disclosure, clinician support mechanisms, and advanced technological solutions. By shifting the focus from individual blame to system-based prevention and resolution, this review offers transferable insights for improving patient safety, enhancing clinician well-being and strengthening safety culture in radiation oncology across diverse healthcare settings.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
11:27Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 4, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...