Adapting PICU UP! to Enhance Early Mobility in a Level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project

Brooke A Krbec1,2, Denise Casey1, Benjamin G Ethier3

  • 1From the Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Pediatric Quality & Safety
|February 25, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Implementing an early mobility strategy in neonatal intensive care units significantly increased physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) consultations for surgical infants. This approach improved developmental care focus with minimal adverse events.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal intensive care
  • Quality improvement science
  • Developmental care

Background:

  • High patient acuity in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can detract from essential developmental care.
  • Structured early mobility programs are crucial for improving outcomes in critically ill infants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and implement the PICU Up! program for neonatal surgical patients.
  • To increase physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) consultations for eligible surgical infants from 25% and 22% to over 75% within 24 months.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a quality improvement framework with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
  • Integrated prompts into rounds, provided education, and optimized documentation.
  • Focused on surgical infants born at 34 weeks' gestation or later.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a significant increase in PT consults from 25% to 95% and OT consults from 22% to 95%.
  • Reduced time to PT consultation from 23 to 8 days and OT consultation from 23 to 9 days.
  • Found no significant changes in length of stay, pressure injury rates, fractures, or unplanned extubations.

Conclusions:

  • Successfully adapted and implemented a standardized early mobility strategy in the NICU.
  • Demonstrated increased and more timely PT and OT consultations.
  • Improved focus on developmental care for neonatal surgical patients with minimal identified risks.
Abstract