Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

The Goeckerman Regimen for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Published on: July 11, 2013
Perceptions over biologics for psoriasis after 5 years of access in Brazil: a cross-sectional study
Leandro Linhares Leite1, André Vicente Esteves de Carvalho2, Catherine Smith3
1Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Background:
Biologic therapies have transformed psoriasis management, and their incorporation into Brazil's public healthcare system (SUS) in 2019 expanded access nationwide. However, real-world utilization and perceptions remain incompletely understood.
Objectives:
To evaluate perceptions, barriers, and prescription patterns regarding biologic therapy among Brazilian dermatologists and patients five years after universal incorporation, while quantifying the prevalence of undertreatment.
Methods:
We conducted two independent cross-sectional online surveys throughout 2024 among dermatologists (n = 225) and patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (n = 1,001). Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and perceived barriers were analyzed.
Results:
Overall, 64.9% of dermatologists prescribed biologics, with higher prescribing rates among younger physicians (p = 0.022), those with fewer years of practice (p = 0.013), higher patient volumes (p < 0.001), and practice in tertiary centers (p = 0.001). Only 25.5% of patients were receiving biologics, strongly associated with psoriatic arthritis (p < 0.001), with no difference between public and private care. Key barriers included perceptions that conventional therapies are sufficient (59.5%), insufficient training (38.0%), and administrative burden (45.5%), while patients mainly reported safety (45.7%) and cost (30.9%) concerns. Undertreatment was prevalent, affecting over 50% of patients with moderate-to-severe disease. While 71.3% of non-users were willing to start biologics, only 28.0% had received a medical recommendation.
Conclusions:
Persistent educational and structural barriers continue to limit optimal biologic use despite formal availability, highlighting the need for targeted education, streamlined care pathways, and improved physician-patient communication to achieve equitable outcomes.
More Related Videos
02:28Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu