Latent Profile Analysis of Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy in ICU Surrogate Decision-Makers and Its Influencing...

Studies of surrogate decision-makers (SDMs) in the intensive care unit (ICU) often report high average levels of family decision-making self-efficacy (FDMSE). However, these findings contrast with the significant decision conflict commonly observed in clinical practice. This discrepancy suggests that high aggregate FDMSE scores may mask underlying subgroups with distinct experiences. Identifying these latent profiles is essential for understanding the true experiences of ICU SDMs.

This study aimed to identify distinct latent profiles of FDMSE among ICU SDMs and explore key influencing factors.

A cross-sectional study was conducted among SDMs of ICU patients. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA) was performed to examine the factor structure of the Chinese FDMSE scale. The verified factor structure was then used for latent profile analysis (LPA). Lastly, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the main influencing factors.

A total of 350 ICU SDMs were included in the analysis. The three-factor model, including treatment decision-making, comfort promotion decision-making, and facing death decision-making, provided a good fit for the Chinese FDMSE scale. Two profiles emerged: 'weak family decision-making self-efficacy', accounting for 55.9% of cases, and 'strong family decision-making self-efficacy', represented by the remaining 44.1%. The 'strong family decision-making self-efficacy' group was more likely to be observed in families where the patients held religious beliefs and were diagnosed with cancer, and where the family decision-makers held religious beliefs, had higher incomes, and had engaged in prior discussions about treatment preferences.

This study verified the multi-dimensionality and heterogeneity of the FDMSE of ICU SDMs through EFA, CFA and LPA. The identification of a subgroup with low FDMSE differs from previous studies. Key modifiable factors include socio-economic resources, prior communication of the patients' preferences, and spiritual and cultural background, which serve as crucial levers for strengthening the decision-support framework in critical care settings.

By identifying two distinct FDMSE profiles and key influencing factors, it offers critical care nurses a new perspective to design targeted interventions, thereby enhancing their ability to provide personalised decision support. Critical care nurses should receive structured end-of-life communication training to address the shared vulnerability of ICU SDMs in facing death decision-making self-efficacy across both profiles.