Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Comparing diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound using microconvex probe versus conventional linear probe to
Partha Pal1, Mohammad Abdul Mateen2, Anuradha Sekaran3
1Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Background And Aims:
Prior studies have reported variable diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) in ulcerative colitis (UC) using linear and/or microconvex probes. This study directly compared these probes for predicting rectal histoendoscopic activity.
Methods:
Adults with UC prospectively underwent transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) with TPUS using linear followed by microconvex probes by blinded operators. Rectal total wall thickness (TWT), vascularity (Modified Limberg score [MLS]), and Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC) were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined area under the curve (AUC) for endoscopic (Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity >1) and histologic (Nancy Index >1) activity, with paired AUC comparisons.
Results:
Ninety-seven patients (32% female; age 18-70 years) were included. For endoscopic activity, TPUS outperformed TAS. Microconvex TPUS showed numerically higher AUCs for selected parameters (TWT: 0.77; vascularity: 0.78; MUC: 0.81) compared with linear TPUS (TWT: 0.75; vascularity: 0.71; MUC: 0.77), although head-to-head differences were not consistently statistically significant. For histologic activity, microconvex and linear TPUS demonstrated comparable performance (AUC range 0.66-0.80). Axial-plane posterior wall thickness assessment with the microconvex probe showed favorable trends over longitudinal measurements (endoscopic: ΔAUC -0.071, P = .074; histologic: ΔAUC 0.081, P = .08). Vascularity-based metrics were consistently superior on TPUS compared with TAS, irrespective of probe type.
Conclusion:
TPUS provides clinically relevant, noninvasive assessment of rectal inflammation in UC. While microconvex TPUS offers technical advantages-particularly axial-plane assessment of posterior wall thickness with favorable diagnostic trends-no single probe demonstrated uniform superiority. These findings highlight the complementary roles of linear and microconvex probes and support ongoing standardization of TPUS.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

