Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

10:45
Time-dependent Increase in the Network Response to the Stimulation of Neuronal Cell Cultures on Micro-electrode Arrays
Published on: May 29, 2017
10.4K
Insight into the impact of focal stimulation on large-scale network dynamics
Amin Kabir1, Prabhjot Dhami1, Raaj Chatterjee1
1Centre for Engineering-Led Brain Research, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia V3T 0A3, Canada.
Journal of Neural Engineering
|February 25, 2026
Summary
Focal brain stimulation alters global brain states in region-specific ways. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and motor cortex (M1) differentially impacts electroencephalography (EEG) microstate dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Brain activity exhibits a hierarchical organization, integrating local circuits into large-scale networks.
- Understanding how focal perturbations affect global brain states is crucial for neural communication and neuromodulation.
- Previous studies often missed dynamic, moment-to-moment fluctuations or focused on pairwise connectivity, neglecting global states.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how focal brain stimulation rapidly alters global brain state dynamics.
- To determine if stimulation of distinct brain regions (DLPFC vs. M1) induces differential changes in brain state dynamics.
- To bridge the gap between focal perturbations and global brain state reconfiguration.
Main Methods:
- Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) in 36 healthy participants.
- Utilized microstate analysis to capture global brain state dynamics at millisecond resolution.
- Examined the effects of single-pulse TMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and primary motor cortex (M1) on EEG microstate dynamics (A-E).
Main Results:
- DLPFC stimulation increased Microstates D and E occurrence and transitions, while suppressing A and B.
- M1 stimulation increased Microstate A occurrence and decreased B occurrence post-pulse.
- Post-pulse microstate dynamics showed significant differences from baseline after DLPFC stimulation compared to M1 stimulation.
Conclusions:
- Focal brain stimulation induces region-specific effects on global brain state dynamics.
- These findings provide a mechanistic basis for neuromodulation strategies targeting site-specific global brain states.
- The results can inform personalized treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders by harnessing targeted brain stimulation effects.

