Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of medical practices.

H S Frazier, H H Hiatt

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |May 26, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Evaluating medical interventions is complex due to challenges in measuring benefits and risks. Improving healthcare data collection and continuous assessment is key to selecting effective treatments.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Response to paper by edward j. Huth, m.d.: the information explosion.

    Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2009
    Same author

    Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.

    Quality & safety in health care·2004
    Same author

    Relationships of patient satisfaction with experience of system performance and health status.

    The Journal of ambulatory care management·1994
    Same author

    Improving health: measuring effects of medical care.

    The Milbank quarterly·1994
    Same author

    The diagnosis of syncope in the elderly.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·1993
    Same author

    Assessing the effectiveness of ambulatory cardiac monitoring for specific clinical indications. Introduction.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·1993

    Area of Science:

    • Medical research methodology
    • Health services research
    • Clinical trial design

    Background:

    • Assessing medical intervention efficacy requires measuring benefits and risks against alternatives.
    • Current healthcare systems present significant obstacles to effective evaluation.
    • These obstacles include fragmented care, poor record-keeping, physician autonomy, and financial barriers.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the difficulties in evaluating medical interventions.
    • To identify systemic barriers within healthcare that impede evaluation.
    • To suggest pathways for improving the selection of beneficial medical interventions.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of healthcare system characteristics impacting evaluation.
    • Identification of factors hindering the accumulation of valid comparative data.
    • Discussion of potential improvements for medical intervention assessment.

    Main Results:

    • Healthcare system features like discontinuous care and inadequate records complicate efficacy evaluation.
    • Physician autonomy, financial disincentives, and definitional ambiguities further inhibit data collection.
    • Lack of continuous evaluation as a standard component of care is a major impediment.

    Conclusions:

    • No single solution exists, but improvements are possible.
    • Addressing systemic issues in healthcare delivery can enhance evaluation capabilities.
    • Better evaluation methods will lead to improved selection of useful medical interventions.

    Related Experiment Videos