Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Monitoring Hippo Signaling Pathway Activity Using a Luciferase-based Large Tumor Suppressor LATS Biosensor
Published on: September 13, 2018
Mesenchymal stem cells differentiate dynamic from static load through variable regulation of the Hippo pathway
Zhihui Xie1, Buer Sen1, Nina Nikitina2
1Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can distinguish between static and dynamic mechanical loads. Dynamic strain activates the Hippo pathway via actin remodeling, while static strain increases nuclear YAP through PP2Ac association with MST1/2.
Area of Science:
- Cell biology
- Mechanobiology
- Biophysics
Background:
- Cellular mechanical environment significantly impacts cell behavior.
- Dynamic loading often promotes anabolic responses, while static loading can lead to catabolic pathophysiology.
- The mechanisms by which cells differentiate between static and dynamic mechanical stimuli remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) differentiate between static strain (SS) and dynamic strain (DS).
- To elucidate the role of the Hippo signaling pathway and actin remodeling in MSCs' response to mechanical loading.
- To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying YAP localization in response to different loading conditions.
Main Methods:
- Applying static and dynamic mechanical strain to MSCs.
- Analyzing nuclear YAP localization using immunofluorescence.
- Investigating Hippo pathway signaling through enzyme phosphorylation.
- Examining actin cytoskeleton remodeling via microscopy.
- Utilizing genetic manipulation (LATS1/2 inhibition, AMOT knockdown).
Main Results:
- Static strain (SS) increased nuclear YAP localization, mediated by PP2Ac association with nuclear MST1/2.
- Dynamic strain (DS) did not increase nuclear YAP but activated Hippo signaling via MST1/2 and YAP phosphorylation.
- DS induced actin remodeling with thicker, aligned fibers; SS reinforced existing actin networks.
- DS-induced actin remodeling involved LATS1/2 and AMOT phosphorylation, affecting AMOT binding.
- SS-induced actin reinforcement sequestered AMOT, influencing YAP dephosphorylation.
Conclusions:
- MSCs possess mechanisms to differentiate between static and dynamic mechanical loading.
- The Hippo pathway and actin cytoskeleton play differential roles in responding to SS and DS.
- Actin remodeling and AMOT dynamics are critical mediators in MSCs' response to mechanical cues.
- These findings reveal nuanced mechanical effects on the Hippo pathway in MSCs.
Related Concept Videos
Multipotency of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Stem Cell Niche
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
iPS Cell Differentiation
Hematopoiesis

