Sex-Based Differences in Left Bundle Branch Capture During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Ilya Y Shadrin1,2, Sara A Coles1, Claus Graff3
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Insights
Sex-based differences in left bundle branch (LBB) capture criteria were identified in patients undergoing LBB area pacing (LBBAP). Shorter R-wave peak times (RWPTs) in females normalized when accounting for heart size, suggesting sex-specific criteria may be needed.
Area of Science:
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Pacing
- Electrocardiography
Background:
- Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an alternative to traditional pacing.
- Established criteria for LBB capture lack sex-specific considerations despite known sex differences in QRS duration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate sex-based differences in meeting left bundle branch (LBB) capture criteria on postimplant electrocardiograms (ECGs).
- To determine if current LBB capture criteria require sex-specific adjustments in LBB area pacing.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 222 patients (>18 years) who underwent dual-chamber LBBAP pacemaker implantation (2020-2023).
- Assessment of baseline and postoperative day 1 (POD1) ECGs for electrical dyssynchrony.
- Left bundle branch capture defined by R-wave peak times (RWPTs) per EHRA 2023 Consensus algorithm.
Main Results:
- Females had shorter baseline QRS duration than males (122 ms vs. 126 ms, p=0.018).
- LBB capture criteria were met by 58.0% of males and 70.9% of females (p=0.058).
- Females exhibited shorter V6-RWPTs (~7 ms shorter, p=0.0008); differences resolved when normalizing for smaller heart size.
Conclusions:
- Females with LBB capture show shorter V6-RWPTs, but this difference is size-dependent.
- Current LBB capture criteria may not be universally applicable across sexes.
- Further research is needed to establish sex-specific criteria for LBB capture assessment.
Objective:
To identify sex-based differences in meeting left bundle branch (LBB) capture criteria on postimplant ECGs.
Background:
Despite differences in QRS duration (QRSd) between males and females, no sex-based criteria have been established for defining LBB capture during LBB area pacing (LBBAP).
Methods:
Patients aged >18 y.o. with a pacing indication and dual-chamber LBBAP pacemaker implantation from 2020 to 2023 were studied. Baseline and postoperative day 1 (POD1) ECGs were assessed for electrical dyssynchrony (QRS-area, sum-absolute integral of QRS-T (SAI QRS-T)), with LBB capture defined based on R-wave peak times (RWPT) per the EHRA 2023 Consensus algorithm.
Results:
The cohort included 222 patients (143 males/79 females, age 74.5±1.1 years, LVEF 53.7±0.4%). Baseline QRSd was significantly shorter among females than males (median 122 ms [90,134] vs 126 ms [102,146]; p = 0.018). LBB capture criteria were met in 83 (58.0%) male and 56 (70.9%) female patients (p = 0.058). Baseline and POD1 dyssynchrony were similar between sexes. However, RWPTs measured in leads V6/I/aVL were ∼7 ms shorter in females than males (V6-RWPT: 66.3 ± 1.6 ms vs. 73.7 ± 1.4 ms, p = 0.0008). Adjusting V6-RWPT up by 7 ms in females resulted in 7/56 patients (12.5%) no longer meeting LBB capture criteria. Significant differences were eliminated when normalizing RWPTs to size parameters (LV size, height, body surface area (BSA)), with no significant correlation between V6-RWPT and size.
Conclusions:
Females with LBB capture exhibit shorter V6-RWPTs despite similar measures of electrical dyssynchrony. This difference disappears when normalizing for the smaller size of female hearts. Additional studies are warranted to establish sex-specific LBB capture criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias


