The molecular evolution of vertebrate organs
1Evolutionary Developmental Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. margarida.cardosomoreira@crick.ac.uk.
Nature Ecology & Evolution
|February 25, 2026
Summary
Vertebrate organ diversity drives ecological success. Technological advances reveal molecular and developmental changes responsible for organ evolution and vertebrate diversification.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Developmental biology
- Genomics
Background:
- Vertebrate ecological and evolutionary success is linked to organ diversity.
- Understanding the origin and diversification of vertebrate organs is a key scientific goal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review major advances in understanding the molecular evolution of vertebrate organs.
- To explore the molecular and developmental changes driving organ diversity.
- To discuss the evolutionary forces shaping vertebrate innovations.
Main Methods:
- Leveraging technological advancements like whole-genome sequencing.
- Utilizing functional and single-cell genomics.
- Employing genome editing tools for functional studies.
Main Results:
- Organs and cell types exhibit differential rates of evolution.
- Specific molecular changes contribute distinctly to organ evolution.
- New complex traits evolve from cellular to organ levels.
Conclusions:
- Technological progress has significantly enhanced our understanding of organ evolution.
- Molecular and developmental changes, driven by evolutionary forces, fuel vertebrate diversification.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
48.8K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.8K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
8.3K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
8.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
3.8K
3.8K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
7.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.1K
Gene Duplication and Divergence
8.1K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
8.1K
Eukaryotic Evolution
42.9K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
42.9K


