Distinct worldviews determine how meat producers navigate competing sustainability priorities in the United States
Sarah M Collier1,2, Noah Janzing3, Mary Fudge4
1Department of Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. scollier@uw.edu.
Abstract:
Beef, pork and broiler producers face complexities in prioritizing sustainability actions. We use Q methodology to explore diverging patterns in how US producers approach sustainability priorities, even among same-species and same-scale operations, with emphasis on animal well-being and environmental stewardship. Three distinct worldviews emerged: one prioritizing animal welfare, another emphasizing holistic environmental stewardship, and a third focused on balancing business viability with other concerns. Our findings can inform strategies for aligning producer actions and consumer expectations for sustainable meat production.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Sustainable Development
Biodiversity and Human Values
Ethical Dilemmas II
Keystone Species
Optimal Foraging


