Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
Refractive prediction error after intrascleral intraocular lens fixation in eyes with long axial length
Masaki Suzue1, So Goto, Susumu Sakimoto
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan (Suzue, Goto, Sakimoto, Nakao, Shiraki, Kentaro Nishida, Maruyama, Sato, Maeno, Kohji Nishida); Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives (OTRI), The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan (Sakimoto, Kohji Nishida); Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan (Maruyama); Premium Research Institute for Human Metaverse Medicine (WPI-PRIMe), The University of Osaka, Suita, Osaka, Japan (Kohji Nishida).
Purpose:
To evaluate the refractive prediction accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after flanged intrascleral IOL fixation (SF-IOL; Yamane technique) in long axial length (AL) eyes.
Setting:
University of Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Design:
Retrospective observational cohort study.
Methods:
Eyes undergoing SF-IOL between January 2023 and April 2024 were classified into normal (N, <26.0 mm) and long (L, ≥26.0 mm) AL groups. Barrett Universal II, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T were evaluated. Prediction error (PE) was defined as 3-month postoperative spherical equivalent minus predicted value. Prediction accuracy was assessed using root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) and the Formula Performance Index (FPI).
Results:
53 eyes from 50 patients were analyzed (N = 35; L = 18). Mean AL was 24.6 ± 0.8 mm (N) and 27.1 ± 1.0 mm (L). Mean PE (N and L) was -0.55 ± 0.72 diopters (D) and -0.64 ± 0.62 D with Barrett Universal II ( P = .52), -0.68 ± 0.77 D and -0.45 ± 0.62 D with Hoffer Q ( P = .32), -0.78 ± 0.74 D and -0.31 ± 0.72 D with Holladay 1 ( P = .043), and -0.74 ± 0.72 D and -0.62 ± 0.72 D with SRK/T ( P = .60). In the L group, Holladay 1 showed PE nearest zero; however, demonstrated steep AL-PE regression slope and low FPI. Barrett Universal II yielded the lowest RMSAE and the highest FPI.
Conclusions:
Barrett Universal II demonstrated the highest overall predictive accuracy in long AL eyes undergoing SF-IOL. Although Holladay 1 produced a smaller PE in long AL, this reflected systematic offset rather than superior accuracy, as indicated by its lower FPI.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...