Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
Published on: January 9, 2014
Spin localization in intermolecular complexes: A challenge for semi-local approximants for the embedding potential
Tanguy Englert1, Pierre-Olivier Roy1, Tomasz A Wesolowski1
1Université de Genève, Départment de Chimie Physique 30, Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Regardless of how the electron correlation is treated, all methods based on frozen-density embedding theory rely on approximations to the non-additive kinetic potential bi-functional ṽtnad[ρA,ρB](r)≈vtnad[ρA,ρB](r). Open shell systems, in which the spin is localized on a specific molecular fragment, are particularly prone to incorrect redistribution of charge depending on the used ṽtnad[ρA,ρB]. In this work, we present a systematic analysis of spin densities obtained with several semi-local approximations to vtnad[ρA,ρB], with the aim of delimiting their respective domains of applicability. We show that spin distributions obtained using decomposable semi-local ṽtnad[ρA,ρB] fall into two distinct categories: they are either qualitatively incorrect or reasonably accurate and consistent with trends previously observed for other properties computed using the same approximants. In neither case do gradient-dependent corrections, although crucial for improving the corresponding energy bi-functional (Tsnad[ρA,ρB]), resolve the deficiencies observed for spin densities. We propose a simple criterion based on orbital energies that allows one to identify a priori the situations in which a given approximant is likely to fail. Finally, we show that a recently developed non-decomposable approximant ṽtnad(NDCS)[ρA,ρB] extends the range of applicability of FDET-based methods to embedded radicals that are inaccessible to semi-local approximants. Moreover, ṽtnad(NDCS)[ρA,ρB] yields improved spin densities even in cases where decomposable semi-local approximants already perform reasonably well.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...

