Comparison of the Ultrasonic Tip with Multidirectional Angular Cutting Geometry with the Straight Dentition Cutting...

Background: The piezoelectric saw is a technology used in osteotomies, providing precise and minimally invasive cuts, especially in areas close to vital structures. Despite its advantages, limitations such as prolonged surgical time and restrictions in use for larger bones have motivated the development of ultrasonic tips with more efficient geometries. Methods: A laboratory trial was conducted with 40 ultrasonic tips (n = 40), divided into 2 groups: the test group (n = 20), with an ultrasonic tip featuring a multidirectional angular cutting-tooth geometry, and the control (n = 20), with a straight-tooth ultrasonic tip. Two operators performed standardized osteotomies on synthetic bone blocks, with monitoring of variables including cutting time (in seconds), maximum block and blade temperature (in °C), and bone mass loss (in grams). Sample randomization was block-based, and blade coding ensured operator and evaluator blinding. Results: The results showed a statistically significant reduction of approximately 26% in cutting time with the multidirectional ultrasonic tips (Test = 52.85 s; Control = 71.55 s; p < 0.001), regardless of the operator. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding maximum bone temperature (Test = 30.45 °C; Control = 29.40 °C; p = 0.337), blade temperature variation (Test = 5.30 °C; Control = 4.10 °C; p = 0.337), overall temperature variation (Test = -0.19 °C; Control = 0.06 °C; p = 0.285), or bone mass loss (Test = 0.1355 g; Control = 0.0350 g; p = 0.387). A significant interaction between operator and blade type in some variables, such as bone temperature variation (p = 0.001), reinforces the influence of technical experience on the results. Conclusions: The multidirectional angular geometry of the ultrasonic tip significantly improves cutting efficiency without compromising thermal safety, representing a promising advancement for optimizing osteotomies in surgical settings. The use of this new geometry may enhance productivity, particularly in complex procedures, and deserves future clinical investigation to expand its applicability across different surgical specialties, including orthopedics.