Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Early Clinical Outcomes of Full-Arch Rehabilitations with Immediately Loaded Implants with Buccal Dehiscence Treated
Alfonso Acerra1, Mario Caggiano1, Angelo Aliberti2
1Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.
Abstract:
Background: Buccal bone dehiscence is a frequent finding during implant placement and often requires horizontal bone augmentation. When combined with immediate loading protocols, concerns remain regarding early implant stability and failure risk. This retrospective case series aimed to describe the early clinical outcomes of immediately loaded implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence treated by horizontal bone augmentation and restored with full-arch screw-retained prostheses. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive edentulous patients were rehabilitated with immediately loaded cross-arch implant-supported prostheses. A total of 253 implants were placed, including 148 implants presenting buccal dehiscence and treated with horizontal bone augmentation using particulate grafting materials with or without autogenous bone and a resorbable collagen membrane. Clinical outcomes were assessed over a 1-year follow-up period. Implant survival and biological complications were recorded. Descriptive statistics were applied. An exploratory event-based comparison between augmented and non-augmented implants was performed using Fisher's exact test, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: At 1 year, no patients were lost to follow-up. Two implant failures occurred, both in augmented sites (2/148; 1.35%), while no failures were observed among non-augmented implants (0/105). The exploratory comparison did not show a statistically significant difference in failure rates between groups (p = 0.51). The estimated RR for implant failure associated with horizontal augmentation was 3.56 (95% CI: 0.17-73.34). Two biological complications (one peri-implantitis and one peri-implant mucositis) were recorded, both involving augmented implants. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective case series, immediately loaded implants placed in sites with buccal dehiscence and treated with horizontal bone augmentation demonstrated high early survival rates and a low incidence of biological complications. These findings are descriptive and exploratory and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Further prospective controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these observations.

