Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026

08:13
Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination
Published on: January 20, 2019
22.6K
Comparison of Immune Cell Transfection by Different Vaccine Vectors After Intradermal Injection
Jiani Liu1, Destin T Hinson2, Michael J Hansen2
1Department of Medicine, Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Vaccines
|February 26, 2026
Summary
Adenovirus (Ad) and messenger RNA lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vectors effectively genetically modify immune cells in skin and lymph nodes after intradermal injection, outperforming DNA-based vectors. These findings highlight the potential of mRNA-LNP and Ad for vaccine development.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Molecular Biology
- Vaccinology
Background:
- Immune cells, including antigen-presenting cells (APCs), are crucial targets for vaccine antigen and transgene protein expression.
- Understanding the efficacy of different molecular therapy vectors for modifying these cells is essential for advancing vaccine and gene therapy strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the genetic modification efficiency of mRNA and DNA-based vectors in immune cells following intradermal injection in mice.
- To evaluate naked DNA, DNA-lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), adenovirus (Ad) vectors, and mRNA-LNPs for their ability to modify immune cells.
Main Methods:
- Cre reporter mice were intradermally injected with various vectors (naked DNA, DNA-LNP, Ad, mRNA-LNP) to assess Cre recombinase delivery.
- Luciferase activity was measured in vivo and ex vivo in the skin, draining lymph node, and liver.
- Immune cell populations (CD45+, CD3+, CD11b+, CD207+) modified by Cre were identified using flow cytometry.
Main Results:
- Adenovirus (Ad) and mRNA-LNP vectors demonstrated superior luciferase and GFP expression in both skin and lymph nodes compared to DNA-LNP and naked DNA.
- mRNA-LNPs and Ad vectors significantly modified CD45+, CD3+, CD11b+, and CD207+ immune cells, with Ad showing higher expression levels.
- Both mRNA-LNP and Ad vectors showed off-target modification in the liver, while DNA-based vectors showed minimal and statistically insignificant activity.
Conclusions:
- mRNA-LNP and Ad vectors are more potent for genetically modifying skin and lymph node immune cells after intradermal delivery than DNA-based vectors.
- The findings support the higher vaccine potency observed with mRNA-LNP and Ad vectors.
- Targeting specific immune cell subsets may enhance efficacy and reduce off-target modifications in tissues like the liver.

