Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Yield of injury testing for contacts of children evaluated for physical abuse
Lígia Batista1, Joanne N Wood2, Tagrid M Ruiz-Maldonado3
1The University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States of America.
Insights
Contact children of physically abused children have a higher risk of injury. Skeletal surveys and neuroimaging revealed injuries more frequently in twins and younger contacts, highlighting the need for targeted testing.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric medicine
- Child abuse and neglect
- Forensic pediatrics
Background:
- Siblings and household contacts of physically abused children face elevated risks of abuse and potential, non-apparent injuries.
- Current recommendations for injury testing in these contact children are not standardized and remain a subject of debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To document the current practices and diagnostic yield of injury testing in contact children exposed to physical abuse.
- To analyze the incidence of injuries detected through skeletal surveys and neuroimaging in this vulnerable population.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted involving children under 10 years old evaluated for physical abuse across 10 US pediatric centers.
- Data were collected on the proportion of contact children undergoing skeletal surveys (SS) and neuroimaging.
- The study also reported the proportion of these tests that successfully identified injuries.
Main Results:
- Out of 6256 index abuse evaluations, 4863 contacts were identified. Among 316 contacts under 24 months with high concern for abuse, 62% had a skeletal survey, revealing fractures in 20 children.
- Skeletal survey completion was higher for twins, infants under 12 months, and those with physical exam findings.
- Neuroimaging in 123 contacts under 12 months with high abuse concern identified intracranial hemorrhage in 5 cases, all of whom were twins.
Conclusions:
- Injuries were more frequently identified in twins and younger contacts when skeletal surveys and neuroimaging were performed.
- Findings suggest that targeted injury testing, particularly skeletal surveys and neuroimaging, is crucial for specific contact groups, including twins and infants.
- The study underscores the importance of considering age and specific risk factors like being a twin when evaluating contacts of physically abused children.
Background:
Siblings and household contacts of physically abused children are at increased risk for physical abuse and may have injuries that are not clinically apparent. However, injury testing recommendations for contact children remain debated.
Objective:
Our objective was to describe testing practices and yield for contacts of physically abused children.
Participants And Settings:
This is a cross-sectional study of children <10 years old evaluated for physical abuse at 10 US pediatric referral centers in the CAPNET research network.
Methods:
We report the proportion of contact children who had a skeletal survey (SS) or neuroimaging and describe the proportion of tests that identified injuries.
Results:
Among 6256 index evaluations, 4863 contacts were identified. Among 794 contacts with physical examinations, 530 had no findings on physical examination and 694 had no history of trauma. Among 316 contacts <24 months old where the index child had high concern for abuse, 196 (62%) had a SS and 20 had fractures identified by the SS. SS completion was more common for twins, contacts <12 months old, and contacts with findings on physical exam. Among 123 contacts <12 months old where there was high concern for abuse in the index child, 49 (40%) had neuroimaging. Of these, 5 had intracranial hemorrhage; all were twins.
Conclusions:
When skeletal survey and neuroimaging were completed in contacts of abused children, injuries were more common in twins and younger contacts.
Related Concept Videos
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...
Plastic Behavior

