Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Allostatic Load Predicts Immune-Related Toxicity and Survival in Melanoma Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint
Jie Shen1, Yufan Guan1, Chase Meyer2
1Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
Background:
Host physiological factors may influence immune response, treatment tolerance, and survival during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Allostatic load (AL) summarizes cumulative physiological dysregulation across multiple biological systems. We evaluated whether pre-treatment AL is associated with immune-related toxicity and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced melanoma receiving ICIs.
Methods:
We analyzed 399 patients with melanoma treated with ICIs at the University of Virginia Cancer Center (2013-2025). AL was derived from routinely collected clinical laboratory biomarkers measured prior to treatment initiation. Multinominal logistic and Cox regression models assessed associations between AL and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment response, disease progression, and overall survival (OS), adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment factors.
Results:
The mean AL score was 4.43. Each 1-unit increase in AL was associated with higher odds of grade ≥ 2 toxicity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.57). Among patients who developed irAEs, higher AL was associated with poorer treatment response (adjusted OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.54) and increased risk of disease progression (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.98-1.33). Higher AL was also associated with shorter OS, with a 26% higher mortality risk per 1-unit increase in AL (adjusted HR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.14-1.39).
Conclusions:
Higher pre-treatment AL was associated with increased immune-related toxicity and poorer survival in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. AL represents a feasible pre-treatment marker of host physiological vulnerability that may complement existing clinical predictors. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and assess clinical utility.
