Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Revisiting the OGIPRO Trial: Dynamic Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Compared with EQ-5D-5L in HER2-Positive
Anatol Aicher1, Marcus Vetter2,3, David Blum1,4
1Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Introduction:
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly valued in oncology for capturing treatment tolerability and quality of life, and they are emerging as important data sources for precision-medicine and AI-driven clinical workflows. While the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire remains a widely used standardized instrument, dynamic electronic PROs (ePROs) collected via mobile applications generate richer, higher-frequency longitudinal data. Their alignment with established PRO measures, however, is not well-understood, limiting their integration into routine care and downstream analytic applications. In the prospective OGIPRO trial (KEK-ZH 2021-D0051), patients with HER2-positive breast cancer reported well-being and symptoms via the Medidux ePRO platform alongside weekly EQ-5D-5L assessments. In this retrospective analysis, we used linear mixed-effects modeling to examine associations between: (i) dynamic ePRO well-being and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS); (ii) dynamic ePRO symptom grades and EQ-5D-5L domain sums; (iii) ePRO symptom grades and EQ-5D-5L disutility using the EQ-5D-5L value set for Germany.
Materials And Methods:
The analytic dataset comprised 13,699 dynamic ePRO data points (3376 well-being ratings and 10,323 symptom grades across 91 symptom types) from 53 patients, forming high-frequency longitudinal patient trajectories. Of these, 252 and 226 time-aligned observations, respectively, were used for direct comparison with EQ-5D-5L VAS and domain scores.
Results:
Dynamic ePRO well-being showed strong agreement with EQ-5D-5L VAS (β = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.015-1.107), with low between-patient variability. In contrast, the agreement between aggregated ePRO symptom grades and EQ-5D-5L domain sums was weaker (β = 0.404, 95% CI: 0.307-0.501) and more heterogeneous across patients. The same applied to the agreement between ePRO symptom grades and EQ-5D-5L disutility (β = 0.213; 95% CI: 0.151-0.275).
Discussion:
Dynamic ePRO well-being aligns closely with EQ-5D-5L VAS scores, supporting its use as a pragmatic substitute in clinical and research settings. Aggregated symptom grades, however, showed limited concordance with EQ-5D-5L domains, indicating the need for more granular analyses on larger datasets.
Conclusions:
Overall, dynamic ePRO systems provide validated, high-resolution longitudinal patient data and represent a scalable foundation for patient monitoring and data-driven decision support in oncology, including future AI-based precision-medicine applications.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Bioequivalence: Overview

