Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Influencing Heart Rate01:30

Factors Influencing Heart Rate

7.0K
The heart rate, or pulse rate, is a vital indicator of cardiovascular health. It reflects the number of times the heart beats per minute. Various physiological and environmental factors influence heart rate, increasing or decreasing cardiac output. Understanding these factors is crucial for assessing heart function and identifying potential health issues.
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
7.0K
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient01:17

Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient

1.7K
The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size. 
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraoperative Techniques for Language Mapping in Brain Surgery: A Comparison Between Direct Electrical Stimulation (DES) and Electrocorticography (ECoG).

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

The cost of re-synchronization in a leaf-cutter ant colony.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Response times are affected by mispredictions in a stochastic game.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

A non-expensive bidimensional kinematic balance assessment can detect early postural instability in people with Parkinson's disease.

Frontiers in neurology·2023
Same author

Comparison of disability level between Early and Late Onset Parkinson's Disease using WHODAS 2.

Frontiers in neurology·2023
Same author

A non-expensive bidimensional assessment can detect subtle alterations in gait performance in people in the early stages of Parkinson's disease.

Frontiers in neurology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.2K

Different Factors Determining Motor Execution and Motor Imagery Performance in a Serial Reaction Time Task with

Patricia Silva de Camargo1,2, Paulo Roberto Cabral-Passos3, André Frazão Helene2

  • 1Institute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil.

Brain Sciences
|February 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Motor imagery (MI) facilitated learning in a probabilistic sequence task, showing performance improvements unlike motor execution (ME). Distinct performance signatures suggest partially different underlying mechanisms for MI and ME during learning.

Keywords:
motor executionmotor imageryprobabilistic motor learningsequence structure learningserial reaction time task

More Related Videos

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.2K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

47.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality
10:14

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Neurorehabilitation Through EEG, Motor Imagery, and Virtual Reality

Published on: May 10, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Motor Learning
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Motor imagery (MI) involves mental practice of actions, sharing neural features with motor execution (ME).
  • The resemblance of performance signatures between MI and ME during learning, especially in variable tasks, is not well understood.
  • This study explores MI and ME similarities and differences in probabilistic sequence learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the similarities and differences in performance-related signatures between motor imagery (MI) and motor execution (ME) during probabilistic sequence learning.
  • To determine if motor imagery supports learning in tasks with intrinsic variability.
  • To identify distinct mechanisms underlying motor imagery and motor execution.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in a finger-tapping serial reaction time task under either motor execution (ME) or motor imagery (MI) conditions.
  • The task utilized a probabilistic sequence with deterministic and variable events, presented via auditory stimuli.
  • Reaction times were analyzed using ANOVA to assess group, block, event type, and last variable event effects.

Main Results:

  • The motor imagery group demonstrated significant learning-induced reaction time reductions, unlike the motor execution group.
  • Both groups responded to the sequence's probabilistic structure, showing differential reaction times across event types.
  • A significant interaction indicated distinct performance signatures for motor imagery and motor execution, with both groups influenced by the last variable event.

Conclusions:

  • Motor imagery effectively supports learning in probabilistic sequence tasks, exhibiting performance improvements.
  • Performance signatures in motor imagery learning differ from those in motor execution, suggesting partially distinct underlying neural mechanisms.
  • The study highlights that while motor imagery aids learning, its mechanisms are not identical to those of motor execution.