Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
The Mydriasis-Free Handheld ERG Device and Its Utility in Clinical Practice: A Review.
Marta Arias-Alvarez1,2, Maria Sopeña-Pinilla2,3, Diego Rodriguez-Mena1
1Department of Neurophysiology, Lozano Blesa University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Portable handheld electroretinography (ERG) devices offer a rapid, non-invasive retinal function assessment, valuable for screening diabetic retinopathy and in pediatric cases where traditional ERG is challenging. Further research is needed to refine protocols and improve accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Devices
- Diagnostic Technology
Background:
- Full field electroretinography (ERG) is crucial for diagnosing retinal diseases.
- Mydriasis-free handheld ERG devices offer portable, non-invasive retinal function assessment.
- These devices are particularly useful for screening diabetic retinopathy (DR) and in pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence on handheld ERG devices in ocular diseases.
- To evaluate their reliability, diagnostic accuracy, and limitations.
- To assess their utility in diverse clinical settings, including retinal diseases, DR, glaucoma, and pediatric cohorts.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed and Embase databases up to December 2024.
- Inclusion of studies evaluating handheld ERG devices in various ocular conditions and populations.
- Exclusion of case reports, abstracts, non-human studies, and letters; narrative synthesis of findings due to heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- 57 studies were included, evaluating handheld ERG in healthy subjects, DR, retinopathies, glaucoma, and pediatric cohorts.
- Handheld ERG devices provide rapid, non-invasive retinal assessment, suitable for screening with good sensitivity and reasonable specificity.
- Limitations include reduced performance in early disease/cone dysfunction, potential false positives, and variability compared to traditional ERG, especially in pediatric patients.
Conclusions:
- Handheld ERG devices are rapid, accessible, and user-friendly complementary tools for retinal assessment.
- They are particularly valuable in early disease detection and in settings where conventional ERG is less feasible.
- Further research is needed to refine protocols, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and validate their use across a wider range of ocular diseases.
More Related Videos
05:00Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Owing to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Published on: April 1, 2019
06:19Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Therapeutic Uses