Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Renal Subcapsular Transplantation of 2'-Deoxyguanosine-Treated Murine Embryonic Thymus in Nude Mice
Published on: July 19, 2019
Envarsus Versus Advagraf in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study
Patricio Más-Serrano1,2,3, Antonio Franco3,4, Marcos Díaz1,3
1Pharmacy Department, University General Hospital Dr. Balmis of Alicante, Calle Pintor Baeza 10, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Background:
Comparative real-world data on the pharmacokinetics of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation remain limited. We compared tacrolimus exposure and dosing requirements with Envarsus and Advagraf during the early post-transplant period.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective, observational, single-center study including adult de novo kidney transplant recipients treated with once-daily tacrolimus as either Envarsus or Advagraf. The immunosuppressive protocol was based on thymoglobulin induction, with delayed initiation of tacrolimus at an initial dose of 0.15 mg/kg/day, prednisone, and sirolimus as the third immunosuppressive agent. Trough concentrations (C0), daily dose, and dose-normalized trough exposure (C0/D) were assessed at 48 h and over 3 months (days 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90). Dose adjustments were guided by therapeutic drug monitoring and Bayesian individualization to achieve target trough ranges (6-10 ng/mL during month 1; 5-7 ng/mL thereafter). Clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes were evaluated through month 3.
Results:
Ninety recipients were included (Advagraf n = 43; Envarsus n = 47). At 48 h, Envarsus achieved higher trough concentrations and higher C0/D than Advagraf (C0: 10.7 vs. 7.7 ng/mL; C0/D: 1.30 vs. 0.75 (ng/mL)/mg; both p < 0.001). From week 1 to month 3, trough concentrations were similar between groups (week 1: 8.5 vs. 8.5 ng/mL, p = 0.968; month 3: 5.7 vs. 5.1 ng/mL, p = 0.234), but Envarsus required lower daily doses (week 1: 6.4 vs. 9.9 mg/day, p = 0.001; month 3: 3.2 vs. 4.1 mg/day, p = 0.021) and maintained higher C0/D (week 1: 1.53 vs. 1.00, p = 0.001; month 3: 1.94 vs. 1.57 (ng/mL)/mg, p = 0.012). At 48 h, infra-therapeutic troughs were less frequent with Envarsus (6.7% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.0001), while supra-therapeutic levels were more frequent (57.8% vs. 18.9%), and tacrolimus discontinuation due to high troughs occurred more often (23.4% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.032). Over 3 months, the proportion of measurements within the therapeutic range was similar (57.6% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.705). Efficacy and safety were similar between groups.
Conclusions:
In de novo kidney transplant recipients, Envarsus provides higher early tacrolimus exposure and consistently higher dose-normalized trough exposure than Advagraf, enabling lower maintenance doses while maintaining similar short-term effectiveness and safety. However, early overexposure was more frequent with Envarsus at 0.15 mg/kg/day, supporting careful early monitoring and consideration of lower starting doses.
Related Concept Videos
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Serum Creatinine Concentration and Clearance
Renal Drug Clearance: Overview
Renal clearance can be calculated using different methods. One approach is to divide the urinary drug excretion rate by the plasma drug concentration. This method directly measures renal clearance, indicating the kidneys' efficiency in...

