Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
Published on: December 28, 2017
18F-FDG PET-CT- vs. CT-Based Radiotherapy Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer
Admir Mulita1, Eleni Bekou2, Pipitsa Valsamaki3
1Department of Radiotherapy/Oncology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Background/Objectives:
Precise staging and tumor delineation are essential for optimizing treatment and enhancing outcomes of radiotherapy (RT). While computed tomography (CT)-based RT remains standard, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) offers improved detection of primary and nodal disease. This study investigates the role of PET/CT in RT planning of HNSCC.
Methods:
Fifty-one HNSCC patients underwent radical volumetric modulated arc RT with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy in a prospective study. Two RT plans per patient were sequentially created by a single oncologist using CT-only and PET/CT data, respectively. Planning target volumes (PTVs) for primary and nodal regions were independently defined, and dose-volume histograms were analyzed and compared.
Results:
PET/CT significantly affected TNM staging, increasing the T-stage in 11.8% of patients and the N-stage in 33.3%. Distant metastases were found in 9.8% of patients, leading to a redefinition of the overall treatment policy. PET/CT-based planning improved primary tumor PTV coverage (PTV4) in 37.2% (19/51) of cases. The tumor areas excluded from the CT-based planning received an average of 85.6% of the prescribed PTV4 dose (range 18-93%), while in PET/CT planning, they received 95.4% (range 93-99%) (p < 0.0001). Nodal PTV areas requiring a booster dose (PTV2) were adjusted in 33.3% (17/51) of patients during PET-CT planning. These nodal areas received an average of 85.6% of the prescribed dose for PTV2 (range 18-93%) during CT planning, compared to 95.4% (range 93-99%) during PET/CT planning. There was no statistically significant difference in the dose received by organs at risk between CT- and PET/CT-RT planning.
Conclusions:
PET/CT improves target delineation for primary tumors and lymph nodes, also allowing for dose escalation in metabolically highly active lesions in patients with HNSCC. The method also reveals occult distant metastases in a subset of patients, enabling personalized treatment strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

