Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Microsurgical Creation of Giant Bifurcation Aneurysms in Rabbits for the Evaluation of Endovascular Devices
Published on: September 8, 2023
Flow Diversion vs. Coiling for Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Matteo Scalise1, Leonardo Di Cosmo2, Carlo Cossa2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Flow diversion (FD) significantly reduces recurrence for large intracranial aneurysms compared to coiling, with similar safety profiles but a slightly higher risk of hemorrhage. FD is becoming a preferred option for unruptured aneurysms.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Interventional Neurology
- Vascular Neurology
Background:
- Large (≥10 mm) and giant (≥25 mm) intracranial aneurysms present significant management challenges due to high rupture risk and procedural complexities.
- Endovascular approaches like flow diversion (FD) offer promise, but comparative data on safety and efficacy against traditional coiling are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of flow diversion (FD) versus coiling for treating large and giant intracranial aneurysms.
- To evaluate outcomes including aneurysm recurrence, occlusion rates, clinical outcomes, and complications.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Included studies published between January 2000 and March 2025 from major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science).
- Assessed outcomes such as recurrence, complete occlusion, clinical outcomes, complications, and mortality, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Main Results:
- The analysis included 1893 patients (1256 FD, 637 Coiling) across 33 studies.
- Flow diversion significantly reduced aneurysm recurrence compared to coiling (8% vs. 27%, p=0.0001) and showed a trend toward higher complete occlusion rates (p=0.0571).
- Flow diversion was associated with a modestly increased rate of hemorrhagic complications (p=0.0495), with no significant differences in other major complications, clinical outcomes, or mortality.
Conclusions:
- Both FD and coiling are effective and safe for large/giant intracranial aneurysms.
- FD demonstrates superior recurrence rates and a trend towards better occlusion, with comparable overall safety but a slightly elevated hemorrhagic risk.
- FD is emerging as a preferred first-line treatment for unruptured large and giant aneurysms, while coiling remains crucial for ruptured cases or anatomical limitations.
More Related Videos
18:50Microsurgical Clip Obliteration of Middle Cerebral Aneurysm Using Intraoperative Flow Assessment
Published on: September 25, 2009
11:58Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies