Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Production and Analysis of Sporosarcina pasteurii Biocement Bricks Using Custom 3D-Printed Molds for Unconfined Compression Tests
Published on: March 7, 2025
Assessing the Porosity-Binder Ratio and Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Strength and Durability of
Jair Arrieta Baldovino1, Oscar E Coronado-Hernández2, Yamid E Nuñez de la Rosa3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia.
This study shows that the porosity-cement index effectively predicts the strength and durability of silty soil stabilized with Portland cement and ground glass powder (GGP). Optimized GGP mixtures significantly enhance soil mechanical behavior and durability.
Area of Science:
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Sustainable Construction
Background:
- Silty soils often require stabilization for engineering applications.
- Recycled ground glass powder (GGP) offers a sustainable alternative binder in soil stabilization.
- Assessing mechanical behavior and durability is crucial for infrastructure development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the mechanical properties (unconfined compressive strength, splitting tensile strength) and durability (accumulated mass loss) of silty soil stabilized with Portland cement and GGP.
- To validate the porosity-cement index (η/Civ) as a predictor for strength and durability.
- To explore the application of machine learning models for predicting soil stabilization performance.
Main Methods:
- Preparation of soil mixtures with varying cement (3-9%), GGP (5-30%), and dry unit weights (13.5-15.5 kN/m³).
- Mechanical testing (486 tests) and durability testing (81 tests) after curing periods of 7, 28, and 90 days.
- Empirical modeling using the porosity-cement index and machine learning analysis with 28 presets.
Main Results:
- A strong power-law relationship (R² > 0.98) was found between the η/Civ index and both unconfined compressive strength (qu) and splitting tensile strength (qt).
- Strength coefficient (A) increased with curing time and GGP content, with qu increasing by over 250% and qt by nearly 700% after 90 days.
- Durability improved significantly with higher density and binder content, showing exponential reductions in accumulated mass loss (ALM) to below 0.5% for mixtures with 30% GGP.
- Machine learning models, particularly Matern 5/2 Gaussian Process Regression and trilayered neural networks, achieved R² > 0.987 in predicting qu, qt, and ALM.
Conclusions:
- The η/Civ index is a reliable predictor of strength and durability for soil-cement-GGP geomaterials.
- Incorporating GGP enhances the mechanical performance and durability of stabilized silty soils.
- Machine learning models show high potential for predicting the behavior of these stabilized soils, facilitating optimized mix design.
Related Concept Videos
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Mortar Properties
Aggregate Cement Ratio

