Psychological Aspects and Implications of Food Addiction and Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot...

Background/Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects more than 38 million Americans and remains a leading public health challenge. Behavioral self-management is central to glycemic control but is often undermined by dysregulated and addictive-like eating behaviors. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers immediate feedback that may strengthen self-regulation, yet the psychological processes linking CGM use, food addiction (FA), and behavior change are poorly understood. This secondary mixed-methods study examined how CGM-supported group medical visits (GMVs) influence glycemic outcomes and FA symptoms in adults with diabetes. Methods: Adults with T2D participated in a 14-week GMV program integrating CGM review with education on nutrition, physical activity, sleep, stress, and intermittent fasting. Thirteen participants had paired CGM summaries and psychosocial data. Quantitative outcomes included mean glucose, glycemic variability, time-in-range (TIR), and symptoms of food addiction using the modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0). Qualitative data came from open-ended surveys analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Integration followed a convergent design, merging individual change trajectories with thematic interpretations and case vignettes. Results: Mean glucose decreased by 21 mg/dL and TIR improved by 9 percentage points. Among six participants with baseline FA symptoms, all showed reductions in self-reported mYFAS 2.0 symptom counts. Four moved from mild to no symptoms, one from moderate to no symptoms, and one from severe to no symptoms. Across the full sample, the mean change was a reduction of 1.2 in the mYFAS 2.0 symptom counts per participant. Thematic analysis identified four interrelated psychological mechanisms: enhanced awareness of food-glucose relationships, increased accountability through shared tracking, motivation via gamified self-monitoring, and relief from cognitive burden associated with dietary uncertainty. Conclusions: Integrating CGM feedback into GMVs was associated with improvements in glycemic metrics and reductions in addictive-like eating symptoms in this pilot sample. These findings position CGM as a behavioral intervention tool that complements its traditional monitoring role and highlight the value of combining real-time biofeedback with group-based support in diabetes care.