Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Real-World Treatment of Patients With Sinus Node Dysfunction and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Nicole Habel1, Sarah Rosemas2, Lucas Higuera2
1University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is less common in patients with sinus node dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). These patients experience a greater disease burden, highlighting a need for optimized treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Sinus node dysfunction (SND) often necessitates permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) complicates PPM decisions due to concerns about worsening heart failure.
- Real-world data on PPM utilization and disease burden in SND patients with coexisting HFpEF is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare permanent pacemaker (PPM) utilization and disease burden in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and coexisting heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus those with SND alone.
- To characterize clinical outcomes in these patient groups within a Medicare population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of Medicare administrative claims data.
- Identification of patients diagnosed with SND, stratified by the presence or absence of HFpEF.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes including PPM implant rates, hospitalizations (HF, AF), AV block, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality.
Main Results:
- The SND+HFpEF cohort (N=26,986) was older and more female than the SND-only cohort (N=74,269).
- PPM implant rates were significantly lower in the SND+HFpEF group (HR=0.811, p<0.0001).
- SND+HFpEF patients experienced higher rates of HF hospitalizations (HR=2.229), AF hospitalizations (HR=1.174), second/third-degree AV block (HR=1.364), and HFrEF (HR=1.640).
Conclusions:
- Patients with both SND and HFpEF exhibit lower PPM utilization and a higher overall disease burden compared to SND-only patients.
- The findings underscore a potential under-treatment of SND in the presence of HFpEF.
- Further research is needed to optimize treatment pathways for the complex SND+HFpEF patient population.
More Related Videos
07:09A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy