Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Development and Validation of the Resilience in Eating Disorders Scale (RED-5)
Carlota Las-Hayas1, Odin Hjemdal2, Pedro-José Muñoz3
1DeustoMED, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain; Red de Investigación en Cronicidad, Atención Primaria y Prevención y Promoción de la Salud (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
A resilience scale tailored for individuals with eating disorders (EDs) could significantly enhance our understanding and treatment of EDs. Therefore, we developed and psychometrically evaluated a new Resilience in Eating Disorders scale (RED) following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines.
Method:
Informed by prior qualitative interviews, the new RED scale underwent an initial pilot test among patients with EDs (n = 52) and field tests among patients with EDs (n = 169), ED-recovered individuals (n = 61), and a normative sample of the general population (n = 349), all aged between 27.9 and 29.8 years and residing in Spain. In this study, the participants completed the RED scale, Resilience Scale-25 (RS-25), Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), World Health Organisation Quality of Life Scale - Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data were collected at baseline and after 1 year. Alongside machine learning techniques, exploratory and confirmatory analyses were employed to evaluate the reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, known-groups validity, predictive validity and responsiveness of the RED scale.
Results:
The original 52-item version of the RED scale was refined to 44 items following the pilot phase, and ultimately reduced to a 5-item version (RED-5) after field testing and psychometric evaluation. The RED-5 demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with excellent model fit indices (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.03, and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.99) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71). Additionally, the RED-5 scale effectively predicted quality of life, anxiety, depression, and ED symptomatology over a 1-year period.
Conclusions:
The RED-5 is a concise, psychometrically robust scale specifically developed to assess resilience in patients with EDs. It significantly predicts ED symptoms and quality-of-life outcomes, making it a valuable tool for both clinical practice and research. The RED-5 allows for quick administration and easy scoring. It provides mental health professionals with a tool to guide resilience-informed assessment and more personalized treatment planning.
Related Concept Videos
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Binge Eating Disorders
Bulimia Nervosa
Reliability and Validity

