Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Extended Anticoagulation Therapy With Rivaroxaban for Cancer-Associated Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism According to
Wei Xiong1,2, Yugo Yamashita2, Takeshi Morimoto3
1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai China.
Background:
The ONCO PE (Optimal Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy for Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Cancer) trial demonstrated the superiority of 18-month compared with 6-month rivaroxaban treatment for cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism in reducing recurrent venous thromboembolism. However, it was uncertain whether the results could be applicable to patients with different performance status (PS) scores, which evaluate the physical condition of patients with cancer undergoing anticancer treatment.
Methods:
In this post hoc subgroup analysis of the ONCO PE trial, we compared the 18-month and 6-month rivaroxaban treatment groups in 2 subgroups: the low PS score (no restricted physical activity: PS=0; n=79) and high PS score (restricted physical activity: PS ≥1; n=99) subgroups. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism, and the major secondary end point was major bleeding.
Results:
The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 18-month rivaroxaban group than in the 6-month rivaroxaban group, significantly among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 19.0%, P=0.049) and numerically among the high PS score subgroup without statistical significance (7.7% versus 19.1%, P=0.10). The rate of major bleeding was not different between the 2 groups among the low PS score subgroup (2.7% versus 7.1%, P=0.39), while it was numerically higher in the 18-month rivaroxaban group than in the 6-month rivaroxaban group among the high PS score subgroup, without statistical significance (11.5% versus 4.3%, P=0.20).
Conclusions:
Extended anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer-associated low-risk pulmonary embolism might have a potential benefit in reducing thrombotic risk irrespective of PS score, whereas there might be some concerns on an increased risk of major bleeding in patients with a high PS score.
Registration:
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04724460.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
