Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Molecular conical intersections with odd electron number are realizations of the topological Yang monopole
1Department of Chemistry, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Abstract:
The two-level conical intersection of a molecule with an odd electron number in the absence of a magnetic field obeys time-reversal symmetry T2 = -1 (referred to as the T2 = -1 conical intersection) and has a five-dimensional branching space due to the Kramer degeneracy. Similar to how the conical intersection of a molecule in a magnetic field (T2 = 0) behaves as the Dirac monopole, the T2 = -1 conical intersection behaves as the Yang monopole, a mathematical generalization of the Dirac monopole with SU(2) gauge field and SO(5) symmetry. This implies that we can study the topological properties of T2 = -1 conical intersections in chemistry based on what is known about the Yang monopole in high energy physics. In this work, we present a few mathematical tools to study this connection. First, we show that geometric algebra and quaternion numbers together provide a natural way to utilize the T2 = -1 time reversal symmetry and the SO(5) symmetry in scaled coordinates, making it simple to derive eigenfunctions, Berry connection, and Berry curvature of T2 = -1 conical intersection. In particular, this approach provides a simple proof that when viewed from the upper or lower states, the T2 = -1 conical intersection behaves as the self-dual or self-antidual Yang monopole with second Chern number C2=+122 or -122, respectively. In addition, we propose a visualization method for the SU(2) Berry connection of T2 = -1 conical intersection. This is achieved by showing that the non-zero part of the Berry connection induces a Hopf-fibration on the S3 longitude space, which is further visualized through stereographic projection.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Valence Bond Theory
Conformations of Cyclohexane
The chair form is the most stable and derives its name from its resemblance to the “easy chair.” In the chair conformation, two carbon atoms are arranged out-of-plane — one above and one below, minimizing the torsional strain. In the chair form, the bond angle is very close to the ideal...
Divergence and Curl of Electric Field
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Molecular Orbital Theory I

