Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Design and methodology of a cluster-randomised controlled trial on cash plus interventions for preventing child
Shelley Walton1, Kemish Kenneth Alier1, Sydney Garretson1
1Johns Hopkins University, Department of International Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Background:
Somalia is a conflict, flood, and drought prone country with high rates of food insecurity and child wasting. Save the Children partnered with Johns Hopkins University to study the most effective and cost-effective combinations of assistance to prevent acute malnutrition among pregnant and lactating women (PLW) and children under five (CU5) in a six-month humanitarian programme. This study implemented an cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) using adaptive design methodology to: (1) estimate and compare wasting incidence and prevalence of CU5 and their mothers receiving on a monthly basis either cash (Arm 1), cash + social and behaviour change communication (Arm 2), or cash + top-up cash (Arm 3); after three months and six months; (2) calculate the costs and cost-effectiveness of the different intervention arms; (3) understand perspectives and experiences of mothers and fathers of CU5 beneficiaries; (4) monitor the functionality of markets and availability and prices of foods. This paper presents the approach that was designed and implemented to study these objectives.
Methods:
This study employed a mixed-methods approach with a quantitative component conducted at three time points to collect anthropometric measurements and household survey data. Primary outcomes, such as child and maternal wasting, were assessed using standardised World Health Organization criteria. Additional data on food security, maternal and child health, and household conditions were collected to evaluate immediate, underlying, and basic causes of malnutrition. Cost analyses evaluated programmatic and societal costs of the intervention. An adaptive trial design was implemented, allowing the methodology to evolve as new challenges emerged.
Conclusions:
This trial applied an adaptive mixed methods design to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cash assistance interventions in Somalia, overcoming complex humanitarian operational challenges. Strong partnerships and flexible trial design allowed us to adjust to unpredictable events and maintain research rigor. These findings highlight the value of adaptive designs and mixed methods for improving child nutrition outcomes in complex settings.
Registration:
The cluster-RCT is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06642012.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...