Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

3.2K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
3.2K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

489
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
489

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging artificial intelligence for analysis of the gut microbiome for dementia diagnosis: a scoping review and discussion.

Frontiers in dementia·2026
Same author

Identification of an Enteroarterial Fistula at a Pancreas Transplant Site on Retrograde Double Balloon Enteroscopy.

ACG case reports journal·2026
Same author

Estimating the causal effects of multiple intermittent treatments with application to COVID-19.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same author

Modeling Workflow, Operational, and Financial Implications of AI-Enabled Same-Day Diagnostic Follow-Up for Screening Mammograms.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same author

A Rare Case of Pyoderma Gangrenosum Pointing to Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.

Case reports in oncological medicine·2025
Same author

Investigating the role of AI explanations in lay individuals' comprehension of radiology reports: A metacognition lens.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Trust, Reproducibility, and Progress: The Roles of Independent Blind Prediction and Assessment and Benchmarking in Computational Biology.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

The Evolving Cyberinfrastructure at the National Institutes of Health to Support Data and AI in Biomedical Research.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

Applications of AI & ML in Biomanufacturing of Cell and Gene Therapies.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

AI for Health: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Healthcare.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

Workshop Introduction: Advances of AI Methods in Single Cell Spatial Omics.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
Same journal

DRIVE-KG: Enhancing variant-phenotype association discovery in understudied complex diseases using heterogeneous knowledge graphs.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K

Leveraging Generative AI for Interpretable Clinical Decision Making Through Causal Graphs.

Mehmet Eren Ahsen1, Rand Kittani2, Travis Gerke3

  • 1Gies College of Business.

Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
|February 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Generative AI creates interpretable structural causal models (SCMs) for clinical AI, improving causal inference. These AI-driven SCMs show comparable performance to human experts in estimating COVID-19 treatment effects.

More Related Videos

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Causal Inference
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Clinical AI adoption is hindered by a lack of interpretability.
  • Generative AI offers potential for medical knowledge integration.
  • Structural Causal Models (SCMs) are crucial for reliable causal inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational framework using generative AI to create interpretable SCMs for clinical applications.
  • To enhance clinical decision support, quality improvement, and population health management.
  • To bridge the interpretability gap in clinical AI for evidence-based medicine.

Main Methods:

  • A case study using the Midwest Healthcare Conference Causal Diagram Challenge dataset.
  • Comparison of transformer-based large language models (LLMs) against human performance.
  • Target trial emulation to estimate COVID-19 treatment effects on mortality using SCMs.
  • Benchmarking against published randomized controlled trial results (RECOVERY trial).

Main Results:

  • AI-designed SCMs achieved >90% bootstrap coverage for most COVID-19 patient severity strata.
  • Both AI and human models showed equivalent clinical plausibility and similar statistical performance.
  • SCM-based approaches demonstrated significantly higher coverage (76-98%) than traditional methods (1-37%).

Conclusions:

  • Interpretable SCMs generated by AI can facilitate reliable causal inference in clinical settings.
  • The framework enables meaningful human-AI collaboration while maintaining methodological rigor.
  • SCMs are a promising solution for enhancing the adoption and trustworthiness of clinical AI.