Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

05:47
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
1.7K
Building Fair and Trustworthy Biomedical AI: A Tool for Identifying Key Decision Points
Nicole Foti1, Janet K Shim2, Caitlin McMahon3
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, nfoti@stanford.edu.
Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing
|February 27, 2026
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) in biomedicine presents ethical challenges. A new Trustworthy AI Decision Map helps teams embed fairness and accountability throughout AI development to ensure trustworthy biomedical AI.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical AI
- Health Informatics
- AI Ethics
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential in biomedicine, improving diagnostics, drug discovery, and patient care.
- However, AI implementation raises significant ethical concerns, including algorithmic bias, health inequities, and data privacy risks.
- Addressing these requires a focus on fairness, trust, and trustworthiness in AI development and deployment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a framework for embedding ethical responsibility in biomedical AI.
- To introduce the Trustworthy AI Decision Map, an adapted tool to guide ethical decision-making across the AI lifecycle.
- To facilitate multi-stakeholder dialogue and institutional accountability in developing fair and trustworthy AI.
Main Methods:
- Adapted a decision-mapping framework from precision medicine research.
- Developed the Trustworthy AI Decision Map to identify key ethical decision points in AI development.
- Illustrated the tool's application using a case study of AI deployment in rural healthcare.
Main Results:
- The Trustworthy AI Decision Map visualizes critical decision points impacting AI fairness and trustworthiness.
- The map aids in anticipating downstream consequences and integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives.
- It supports the establishment of institutional accountability for ethical AI practices.
Conclusions:
- Ethical considerations must be integrated at institutional and individual levels in biomedical AI.
- Multi-stakeholder engagement, particularly with underrepresented groups, is crucial for equitable AI.
- Further empirical validation of the Trustworthy AI Decision Map is needed to refine its utility in promoting fair and trustworthy biomedical AI.